How Democratic was Andrew Jackson?

Andrew capital of Mississippi was a democratic bit by patroniseing the volumes choices and indispensablenessing their voices to be agreely heard, moreover that is non the case through break through his governance. He is considered Democratic because he lossed every unitys opinions to be heard and equally represented. devour apprise fill different meanings, on the dot ultimately they all correspond with severally adversary. A commonwealth is a governing body ran by the nation through the representatives that were elected. The democracy has a principle of equality amid social socio-economic classes and between individuals.capital of Mississippi look atd that the rich and goodly people got a style with bending the acts of the judicature to get what they cherished, as shown in enrolment F. He wrote a bank ban message to congress on July 10th, 1832, capital of Mississippi is worried that the more than one quarter of the stock is in foreign turn over and the rest is in the hands of the richest class citizens. capital of Mississippi believes that the rich and powerful people bend the acts of the government to fulfill their selfish needs.Andrew Jack tidings wants the liberty and independence to be restores in the banks for our country. Andrew Jacksons boorishness as shown in the background demonstrate was ab come out of the closet how he grew up and what he was exposed to as a child. Jacksons father died before he was born so his m separate was his primal feartaker who did non have much money. He also enlisted in the Revolutionary state of war at the young age of 13 imagine being 13 and red to war, now of days that cordial of pictorial matter to adolescences is absurd.Andrew Jackson was not an easy child to raise, moreover his attitude, hard headed personality, and persistence can be seen as a make in account D explaining that no matter how old Jackson was, he always had that stern attitude with him. In this document Jackson insisted that all the offices from the ordained or elected should be to a lower berth place the control of the peoples rule. Also he model it would be fairly equal if the president should only serve a atomic number 53 term of four years, this way if one need of the people was not snug then hopefully the next death chair would succeed in that flaw.Although Jacksons harsh personality may have been beneficial at times, at other times it can be see different. Document E shows a calculate of Andrew Jackson dressed as a king standing upon the Constitution of the join States that is ripped to pieces. This is obviously a political resume coming from someone who did not support Jacksons decisions. The cartoon is inferring that Jackson acted as a king and make his own rules, rather than acting alike(p) the President. Some of the decisions he brought about do it difficult for people to see him as democratic.For example in document O it showed a chart of Andrew Jacksons slaveholdi ngs, the numbers visibly increased during his presidency throughout 1829-1837. This goes in the complete opposite direction of democracy. Personally it expects like Jackson was only democratic when it referred to his needs also. This is not verbaliseing that Jackson was some kind of manipulating jerk who only cared about himself, he bonny did matters not completely for the peoples needs, and document M proves exactly that point.Jackson did do a very stately and heartwarming thing by adopting Lyncoya, curiously since Lyncoya had no one to take care of him and the other people wanted him dead. In the letter he wrote to his wife Rachel he said that it Charity and Christianity says he ought be taken care of this proves he honestly did care about others and ultimately did want the best thing for them. On the other hand the other letter he wrote to Rachel was telling Rachel to tell their adopted son to read his book and do what she said, wake that Lyncoya must have been acting out. Taking Lyncoya out of his comfort zone and everything that he knew may have not been the best thing for him Jackson was nerve-wracking to convert him into the American lifestyle that Lyncoya was not used to. The Indian removal map in document L shows that the natives were not respected among the Americans. every the natives from the Seminole tribe in Florida, to the Choctaw tribe in Mississippi were forced into the Indian soil located by Arkansas and Missouri, or in other words out of the states. And in Document K shows that the natives were not included in this democracy since their opinions did not matter to the rest of the United States.The Cherokee democracy just wanted to live on the land that they lived on for years, they didnt want to be moved to a collapse place, they wanted to stay on their land because it was sentimental to them and it was their home. They didnt rebel against the American people , but lived in wild pansy with and fought together as alliances. The nat ives just wanted to stay where they grew up and that was what they spoke.Andrew Jackson did seem like he cared about the Indians in document J by trying to help the Indians out by consideration up a distinct arena for them to live, butwhat he didnt attend to or understand was that it was their home, not just a place where they lived. In conclusion, you could say that Andrew Jackson was democratic by the way he wanted to help the lower class be heard and brought equal to the wealthier class. But then again his encounters with the natural Americans and the facts with his slaveholdings make him seem undemocratic. However, I genuinely do believe that Andrew Jackson time-tested to do the best thing for the people, but I do not believe that he elaborated much on some of the complicated situations he dealt with throughout his time as President.